Food Class Action Lawsuits

Food Class Action lawsuits are certainly becoming a more common tool in personal injury litigation. In fact, as one of the most common forms of personal injury litigation available to plaintiffs today, they have become so popular that many law firms now engage in this form of litigation as their primary form of business practice. If you are seeking class action lawsuit funding to assist with pursuing a personal injury case brought by means of defective (but otherwise safe) food, contact one of today’s well-established legal funding companies today. There is literally no limit to the types of injury cases that can be pursued via class action lawsuit loans.

California is currently at the bottom of the list of states evaluated in this study.

The state ranks dead last for the quality of its judicial process, 49th for its treatment of contract and tort litigation, and 48th for the treatment of class action lawsuit lawsuits. The above statistics are derived from a study completed by the National Association of State Bankruptcy Attorneys, who also noted that California’s signature on the Class Action Law is being challenged due to an increasing number of cases that have been granted summary dismissal. According to the study, these dismissals occur “most often at the request of the plaintiffs’ counsel.” As the state’s attorney general continually warns, the process of seeking summary dismissals is “vigorous and time-consuming.”

Only two of the top twenty states – Maryland and Minnesota – retained a high percentage of positive class actions verdicts when comparing them with the national average.

Surprisingly enough, these two states – Maryland and Minnesota – retained a high percentage of positive verdicts despite the fact that they allow class members the right to opt out of a lawsuit provided that such opt-out is made in accordance with state statute. The reason that only two states are able to maintain such high percentages is because in terms of monetary damages, plaintiffs in class actions receive significantly less monetary benefits than those awarded in tort law cases. However, even with such statuses, class action lawyers have yet to win many major lawsuits in either the personal injury or wrongful death categories. And, it is perhaps for this very reason that most attorneys are reluctant to offer much guidance to those who are seriously considering filing a personal injury lawsuit.

The Food and Drug Administration is responsible for regulating the safety of the nation’s food supply.

Because of this regulation, food manufacturers and distributors are required to conduct controlled studies prior to submitting their food for sale to the marketplace. But as the FDA assures consumers that their food is safe, more Americans are turning to litigation to force food producers and distributors to properly label their products and conduct adequate tests prior to being released into the marketplace. Indeed, food class action lawsuits filed by consumers are particularly popular with individuals who feel as though they have been severely injured as a result of negligence on the part of food producers and distributors.

In recent years, however, as the number of pet food lawsuits has risen, so has the number of attorneys who have seen such cases as a viable legal theory for pursuing claims on their client’s behalf.

As pet food recalls and other food-related litigation grows in number, attorneys representing these clients have seen an increase in class action lawsuit filings. This growth in litigation is likely due to both changes in the way that the FDA regulates food and the relative ease with which certain types of food can be purchased without a physician’s prescription. Furthermore, some plaintiffs may be hesitant to pursue litigation if they believe that such lawsuits would be too expensive for them, especially given the relatively limited success rate of such lawsuits.

To illustrate how difficult it can be for plaintiffs to successfully pursue this type of lawsuit, consider the case ofurized poultry.

In this instance, the pet food companies knew that their products were dangerous to consumers. Yet, in trying to save money by pleading ignorance, the company representatives actually argued, “Many people die each year from illnesses caused by ingesting chicken that’s been injected with growth hormones.” Under the prevailing conditions, it appears that the only way that the food companies could avoid class action lawsuits on their behalf would be to do nothing wrong…and in this instance, that might be the case.

You May Also Like

More From Author

+ There are no comments

Add yours