The Rudy Indiana Otis Law is another example of the many changes that took place in Louisiana over the course of our history. This particular law started incrop in 1778, and it was revised and became a Statute of Limitations. There have been many instances where this Statute has been used successfully. But, many people are still unfamiliar with it. For more information about this Statute, please read on below. There will also be a link that you can click on to take you to an official website that explains all about this statute.
First, the brief version of the facts that the Rudy Indiana Otis Law states is that there was a dispute between two neighbors over a disputed area of land. A legal agreement was made in which the defendant was ordered to pay damages to the plaintiff. The land in question was supposed to belong to the plaintiff. At the time, the land belonged to the defendant. Therefore, at the conclusion of the case, it was determined that the plaintiff did not hold title to the disputed land.
The reason for this is that at the time of the lawsuit the plaintiff had been paying all of the expenses, attorney’s fees, etc., out of his own pocket. Therefore, he was very financially distressed and had no money left over to litigate. To rectify this, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss that stated that the case should be dismissed because it was not a case that could be brought in a court of law. The motion to dismiss was accepted by the judge who ordered that the case be dismissed.
Some may wonder what the difference was here. Is the case different if a judgment debtor is trying to recover money from you? Actually, the answer is no. The reasoning is that a case cannot be held in court unless it is brought in a court of law. It then becomes a question of the viability of the complaint. If the complaint cannot show that there is a case there is no need to have it tried in a court of law.
If the plaintiff does not want to spend the money to hire an attorney, then the case can proceed as scheduled. In other words, the plaintiff need not pay any legal fees or court costs. In addition, the judgment debtor will receive a certificate of judgment which is a court record. However, the certificate of judgment will not be able to serve as a proof of the debt in the future.
What does this mean for you? Basically, the plaintiff is giving up any right he may have had to collect on the debt. This does not mean that the debtor cannot collect on other liens. The judge may issue a writ of garnishment to the defendant stating that the plaintiff must pay off the debts within a certain amount of time or the defendant will have priority over him in the collection of the money.
It is always prudent to consult with a personal law attorney before taking any action in a civil or criminal court of law. If you think you have a financial problem and you believe that the judgment debtor owes you money then you should get in touch with a judgment lawyer. An experienced attorney will know all the laws that govern your state. Also, he will know about the defenses to filing a complaint. Rudy Indiana laws are different than the federal law. Federal law is very complex and many aspects of it are beyond the knowledge of ordinary people.
You should now understand that the Rudy Indiana wage garnishment law has its limitations. It only applies to certain types of debt. This means that if the judgment debtor is an alcoholic he cannot be forced to pay for an alcohol evaluation. But, if he is not able to pay for his own alcohol treatment then the judgment creditor will have the power to institute a wage garnishment order against him. If you do owe money to your judgment debtor and think that he may be able to sue you for repayment purposes then you should first consult a good and experienced judgment lawyer who will know all about Rudy Indiana wage garnishment laws.
+ There are no comments
Add yours