What Are the Advantages of a Drivetime Lawsuit?

In a recent ruling in California by the superior court, the Appellate Division of the California Supreme Court found that plaintiff did not have sufficient cause to file a drivetime lawsuit against the defendant’s JVC car audio system, which is owned and operated by Logitech. The opinion, written by Justice Edward G. Morrison, was based on a decade-long dispute that stemmed from the owner’s refusal to replace an air conditioner that operated at inadequate levels in the car. In that case, the superior court found that the car owner, who was not a licensed plumber, had simply been doing a job that violated the Californian chemical use laws, but the court declined to find that the employer’s refusal to repair the problem represented a legal liability for the employer.

The plaintiff’s attorney, Mark R. Zaidman, of Las Vegas, is representing the drivetime lawsuit plaintiffs.

Mr. Zaidman contends that the majority of these situations are not likely to result in monetary damages that justify a move toward drivetime lawsuit litigation. He has advised his clients to retain counsel because there are some inherent difficulties inherent in such a case.

A drivetime lawsuit occurs when an employee while working in a job, uses a cell phone, personal computer, or another electronic device to make calls during the work period, and thereby violates the employer’s rules regulating the use of electronic devices in the workplace. For example, in a common scenario, an individual who is working in a call center makes numerous telephone calls during the day, even when an employer is aware that such activities are prohibited. This type of violation can result in both monetary and/or reputation damages, depending upon the situation. If you have been injured as a result of such activity, you may be able to recover your losses through drivetime lawsuit damages. Your lawyer can assist you in determining whether such damages are merited based on the facts of your case.

You should consult with a qualified Los Angeles personal injury lawyer who has experience dealing with drivetime lawsuits.

If you have been injured in such activity, you should research the various aspects of this law. While it is true that the law firm that represents you is called a law firm, it does not always follow that each attorney in the firm specializes in a particular area of the law. Therefore, when you work with a Los Angeles law firm, you should make sure that you are not working with an attorney who only has experience in handling cases involving employers’ liability for drivetime lawsuits. You should also make sure that you are not working with an attorney who is unfamiliar with local regulations. The more research you do into your potential attorneys, the better prepared you will be to make decisions about your case.

As with any legal issue, you should obtain as much information as possible before you decide to proceed with a drivetime lawsuit.

The more you know, the better prepared you will be to decide on a defense strategy. You should speak with several attorneys before making a final decision. After all, if you choose the wrong law firm or personal injury attorney, you may be stuck paying a huge bill for an unnecessary lawsuit.

A good law firm or attorney should be familiar with the particular facts of your case. They should also understand the statutes that govern the type of harm that you have suffered. If your case involves an employer’s negligence in providing proper driving training, your attorneys should know the applicable rules and regulations. Additionally, your attorneys should have a strong understanding of Los Angeles municipal ordinances. This includes but is not limited to, those laws that deal with noise level restrictions, vehicle noise restrictions, parking regulations, and so on. If a Los Angeles court finds that the employer’s conduct was found to be the cause of your injury, then they may award you compensation for past and future medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, future losses, and other related damages.